When the regular customer becomes king – and why that’s nonsense

Gewohnheitsrecht gibt es nicht

A death in the team. People are grieving. Appointments are being rescheduled.
And somewhere, someone is standing at reception saying, “I always come. I pay regularly. I want my appointment as usual.”

Seriously?

Welcome to the parallel world where paying regularly is suddenly understood as a title of nobility.

The misconception of “customary law”

Just because someone regularly uses a service doesn’t create a right to untouchability. It’s not a status symbol.
It’s not a “But you have to.”
A hair salon isn’t a subscription machine, but a place where people work. With families. With feelings. With hardships.
Regular service is an agreement. Friendliness is a service. Flexibility is a courtesy.
None of this is a customary right.

“I’m paying.”

Yes. And the salon works for it. This isn’t an act of charity. It’s an exchange.
Anyone who believes that payment automatically creates special privileges is confusing service with serfdom.

Does a regular customer have special rights?

No. A regular customer has:
– trust
– an established relationship
– perhaps priority when scheduling appointments

But he has no right to demand that people put aside their grief to accommodate his habit.
Special privileges arise from leniency. And leniency is voluntary.

How much understanding can one expect?

In a situation like a death? That’s the bare minimum.
If there’s no room even for that, then we’re not talking about loyalty—we’re talking about entitlement.
And entitlement without empathy isn’t loyalty.

It is egoism.

When do you need to protect yourself?

Immediately. At the very latest when:
– pressure is applied
– emotional manipulation occurs
– guilt is instilled
– threats are made with “I’ll never come back”

A company that abandons its team to secure revenue pays a higher price in the long run. Employees remember.
Customers come and go, or become increasingly selfish.

Do you have to put up with emotional pressure?

No. No one should have to listen to:
– “I don’t care.”
– “I’m paying!”
– “That’s unprofessional.”

It is unprofessional not to accept exceptional human situations.

And what about other service providers?

Imagine this:
– A dentist reschedules appointments due to a family emergency. Would you behave like that in such a situation?
A physiotherapist has to close at short notice. Would you explain to her that you pay regularly?
A restaurant remains closed due to a death in the staff. Would they demand that it at least open “for regular customers”?

So why do some people believe this is legitimate in a salon?

Perhaps because hairdressers are friendly. Solution-oriented. Very keen to make their customers look their best.

Kindness is not a contract.

Regular appointments are not a claim to ownership. Goodwill is not a permanent state. And anyone who believes that loyalty means exerting pressure in exceptional situations has not understood the principle of a relationship.

A true customer relationship isn’t revealed when everything is going smoothly, but when things aren’t.

Should the relationship be ended?

Sometimes, yes. Not out of spite, but out of self-respect. A customer who doesn’t show a minimum of humanity in an exceptional situation will continue to exert pressure in the future if something doesn’t suit them. Sales are important.

But dignity is more important. A salon isn’t a self-service system. It’s a place with real people. Regular customers are welcome. Regular customers are valued. Regularly kind customers are a pleasure.

But nobody – absolutely nobody – gains a customary right to the absence of exceptions as a result.

Loyalty is not a one-way street.

That’s not what I expected – I’m not paying that!

There are those magical moments in the hair salon: You sit there, the cape tied around your neck like a royal sash, full of hope that you’ll leave the shop looking like a mix of a runway model and a Renaissance painting. The hairdresser nods sympathetically, the customer beams with anticipation—what could possibly go wrong? Well, that’s just it.

“I would like a layered cut, but without the hair looking thinner at the ends.”

It’s a bit like saying in a restaurant, “I’d like my steak medium, but well-done.”
Layered means: shorter hair on top, longer hair on the bottom. And what happens when you cut hair shorter and lift it? Exactly: the lengths look thinner. That’s not a surprising plot twist; that’s basic hairdressing.
So the hairdresser does exactly what was requested. He cuts layers. Professionally. Precisely. Technically correctly. And the customer? “Oh. So these are… layers?” Yes. Yes, they are. Surprise.

“I want curtain bangs! But not so fringy…”

Curtain bangs are fringed. That’s literally their entire character. Curtain bangs without soft, thinned edges would simply be: a pony that’s gotten too long. Or two sad tufts of hair on the sides of the face.
The hairdresser knows that. The customer often doesn’t. And when the result looks just like it has to, but not like the customer imagined it in their romanticized TikTok vision – well, that’s not a mistake. That’s reality vs. Pinterest.

I don’t really like the hair color…“

Colors are tricky. Anyone who’s ever tried to paint a wall “vanilla cream” and ended up with a shocking “baby duckling yellow” knows that. Hairdressers mix professionally, taking into account pigments, the hair’s starting color, and texture.

What he can’t influence: the lighting conditions in the customer’s living room. The opinion of the partner (“I liked the old one better.”). The sudden realization that copper might not be the inner Boho goddess, but rather Aunt Erna with her henna hobby.

But is this the hairdresser’s fault?
Can one then refuse to pay the price, or does one have the right to complain about it?

No.

He delivered exactly what was ordered. Why shouldn’t the hairdresser charge the full price then? Because a hairdresser is not a fortune teller. Because a hairdresser can’t install a Photoshop AI on a customer’s head either.

Because a hairdresser works as a craftsman — and if he does what was commissioned, he has fulfilled his obligation.

You pay for the pizza even if you suddenly don’t feel like eating salami anymore; the taxi ride even if you realize in the car that you would rather go somewhere else; or the custom-made clothing even if you realize that beige might not be your color after all.

So why should the hairdresser work for free or apologize just because the customer misjudged their own styling fantasies?

The truth ist very simple

A hairdresser owes professional execution, not the implementation of an Instagram filter in reality.
The hairdresser has done his job. The customer has made his decision.

And if the two don’t match – that’s embarrassing for the decision, not for the hairdresser.

So yes: It is absolutely fine for the hairdresser to charge for the full service.

For professional work remains professional work – even if the customer ends up saying:

“I wanted it exactly like this – but different.”